Golf Course Management

OCT 2018

Golf Course Management magazine is dedicated to advancing the golf course superintendent profession and helping GCSAA members achieve career success.

Issue link: http://gcmdigital.gcsaa.org/i/1031201

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 77 of 101

74 GOLF COURSE MANAGEMENT 10.18 ity found in plots fertilized with the slow- release source SCU or with a commercial product made from poultry waste (Ringer Lawn Restore). None of the nitrogen sources reduced thatch (as compared to the unfer - tilized control plot), and application of one source (Compro, a composted sewage waste that contained wood chips) increased thatch depth. e only treatment that significantly and consistently increased organic matter — only in the upper 1 inch (2.5 cm), and not deeper — was a nitrogen source from poultry waste (Sustane). None of the nitrogen sources reduced any populations of the plant parasitic nematodes that were measured. None of the applied nitrogen sources con - sistently reduced dollar spot, when averaged over the growing season. However, applica - tion of the poultry waste material Ringer Lawn Restore, or the synthetic organic source urea did delay the time until the dollar spot reached an unacceptable threshold. When these two products were applied, dollar spot did not exceed the unacceptable thresh - old until mid-June, instead of reaching it in May. is was not an effect of any microbial stimulation but was rather a result of better nitrogen availability from those products. In fact, the composted sewage waste prod - uct that contained wood chips (Compro) de- creased turf quality and increased dollar spot as compared to the unfertilized plots, a result of decreased nitrogen availability from that product. In this study, any ability of organic nitrogen products to affect dollar spot was more a result of nitrogen availability from the products and not related to any stimulation of the microbial pool or increased soil organic matter content. Source: J. Graham Davis and Peter H. Derno - eden. 2002. Dollar spot severity, tissue nitro- gen, and soil microbial activity in bentgrass as influenced by nitrogen source. Crop Science 42:480-488. Beth Guertal, Ph.D., is a professor in the Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences at Auburn Univer - sity in Auburn, Ala., and president-elect of the Crop Sci- ence Society of America. She is a 20-year member of GCSAA. Beth Guertal, Ph.D. guertea@auburn.edu Twitter: @AUTurfFert Out, damned (dollar) spot! (verdure) Lately, there have been some really inter- esting discussions on a Facebook turfgrass group that are related to the effects various nitrogen fertilizers may have on dollar spot (caused by Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Ben - nett). e topic created enough discussion that I thought I'd see what was in the sci - entific literature that addressed this topic. I found a 2002 paper published by Dr. Pete Dernoeden of the University of Maryland, in which he and his graduate student examined a range of nitrogen sources for their effects on dollar spot, organic matter and soil microbial activity. Specifically, for the study, they used an established plot of Southshore creeping bentgrass that was managed as a fairway. ere were three replications of each treat - ment. e specific treatments were commer- cial nitrogen sources from a variety of waste sources, including composted sewage sludge (biosolid), activated sewage sludge and poul - try waste materials (both composted or acti- vated). Trade names of the various products included Milorganite, Earthgro, Sustane, Ringer, Compro and Scotts (their organic product). e synthetic organic nitrogen fer - tilizers urea and sulfur-coated urea (SCU) were also included, as were plots that received no nitrogen. All materials were applied to the plots in October, November, December and May of each year at a rate of 1 pound nitro - gen/1,000 square feet (50 kg/hectare). ese nitrogen sources were applied for a total of seven continuous years, with the data dis - cussed here collected in the last three years of the applications. Collected data included turfgrass qual - ity, thatch depth and organic matter content, leaf tissue nitrogen and populations of plant parasitic nematodes. In the summer months, total soil microbial activity was measured, and that data was collected every two weeks. Finally, dollar spot infection was measured by taking a weekly count of the number of infection centers in each plot from 1998 to 2000. e number of infection centers was a guide to determining the level at which the turf was considered unacceptable, by the standards of a turfgrass manager. Turfgrass quality varied depending on the nitrogen source, with highest turf qual - None of the applied nitrogen sources consistently reduced dollar spot, when averaged over the growing season.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Golf Course Management - OCT 2018